Congress

Sen Kennedy is GOING OFF: socialism is for MORONS; Kaine lashes out at AOC; Dems turning on Schumer

By HYGO News Published · Updated
Sen Kennedy is GOING OFF: socialism is for MORONS; Kaine lashes out at AOC; Dems turning on Schumer

Sen Kennedy is GOING OFF: socialism is for MORONS; Kaine lashes out at AOC; Dems turning on Schumer

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) unleashed a Kennedy-style attack on Seattle’s new socialist mayor and the Democratic Party. Kennedy: “Those who have read history clearly understand that socialism is for morons.” Seattle just elected Katie Wilson, whom Kennedy characterized as “a typical moonbat” who “probably eats tofu and organic broccoli” and is a “self-avowed socialist.” Kennedy diagnosed the Democratic Party: “The moon wing, the Bolshevik wing, the socialist wing of the Democratic Party is obviously in control.” He channeled Jack Nicholson: “Go sell crazy somewhere else, we’re all stocked up here” — saying Schumer should have watched the movie. Kennedy said Democrats “hurt the American people badly” with the shutdown but Republicans “all stuck together with the exception of Senator Paul.” Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) lashed out at AOC for calling Senate Democrats weak, noting his 320,000 Virginia federal employees were back to work and asking if AOC wanted “another week of SNAP recipients losing their SNAP benefits?” Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) called for Schumer’s resignation: “The reality is, Chuck Schumer failed us … The Senate needs new leadership.” Kennedy: “Those who have read history clearly understand that socialism is for morons … I’ll stop being mean if she’ll stop being foolish.” Kaine: “Would it have been another week of SNAP recipients losing their SNAP benefits? Another month of air traffic or air travelers enduring chaos and even danger?” Ramirez: “Chuck Schumer failed us … The Senate needs new leadership.”

Kennedy on Socialism

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) opened with characteristic directness. “Those who have read history clearly understand that socialism is for morons.”

Kennedy’s framework: socialism’s historical record is unambiguous. Venezuela, Cuba, USSR, Maoist China, North Korea, Eastern Europe — all socialist experiments produced mass poverty, political imprisonment, mass death, and societal collapse.

“Those who have read history” — implication: socialists are either uneducated (don’t know history) or willfully ignorant (know but don’t care).

Seattle’s New Mayor

“I love Seattle. They just elected a new mayor. I don’t know her, but I’ve read a lot about her. She’s a typical moonbat.”

Kennedy’s characterization of Katie Wilson (Seattle mayor-elect):

  • “Typical moonbat” (slang for extreme progressive)
  • Community organizer background
  • Self-avowed socialist

“A community organizer probably eats tofu and organic broccoli. She’s a self-avowed socialist.”

Kennedy’s Kennedy-isms work through exaggeration. “Tofu and organic broccoli” is caricature — but captures a reality about urban progressive cultural preferences.

“She’s proud of things that she should be ashamed of.”

Kennedy’s framework: Wilson takes pride in socialist framework that historically produced disaster.

”I’ll Stop Being Mean”

“She’s entitled to her opinion and I guess what I just said is kind of mean. I’ll stop being mean if she’ll stop being foolish.”

Kennedy’s Southern-gentleman-with-edge framework. Acknowledges meanness while offering a conditional.

The conditional: Wilson’s socialist framework is “foolish” — stop the foolishness, the mocking stops.

”Bolshevik Wing”

“The moon wing, the Bolshevik wing, the socialist wing of the Democratic Party is obviously in control.”

Kennedy’s diagnosis: Democratic Party is controlled by its most extreme wing. “Moon wing” (moonbats), “Bolshevik wing” (Russian revolutionary reference), “socialist wing” (economic framework).

“That’s what drove the shutdown. That’s what made Senator Schumer do what he did. He knew better.”

Kennedy’s framework: Schumer personally knew the shutdown was political malpractice. But the socialist/Bolshevik wing forced his hand. Schumer could have compromised; party pressure prevented it.

“Remember the old Jack Nicholson movie line, a go-sell crazy somewhere else, we’re all stocked up here.”

The reference: “As Good As It Gets” (1997) — Jack Nicholson’s character tells someone “go sell crazy somewhere else, we’re all stocked up here.”

Kennedy’s application: Schumer should have told the socialist wing “we’re stocked up on crazy, go sell it somewhere else.” Instead he accommodated them.

”Needed Therapy”

“I don’t think Chuck saw the movie. Chuck kept saying we got this, but none of them had it and they all needed therapy.”

The framework: Schumer’s confidence was misplaced. “None of them had it” — they weren’t actually winning politically. Alpert’s patient pool of TDS-afflicted Democrats shows who was really losing.

“They hurt the American people badly, but we all stuck together with the exception of Senator Paul.”

Kennedy’s framework: Republicans unified except Rand Paul (who objected to Kennedy’s pay-withholding bill). The exception didn’t damage unity.

“I want to thank President Trump for sticking with us.”

Trump stayed firm. The 5 Democratic defectors were what broke the Democratic coalition.

The AOC/Kaine Exchange

The transcript then captured AOC criticizing Senate Democrats. “The lesson that they’re learning is that Democrats are weak and that next time we just need to hurt working people and working Americans more to get them to hold.”

AOC’s framework: Senate Democrats who ended shutdown are “weak.” Next time, more pain for workers to force continued resistance. The position is extraordinary — demand workers suffer more.

“And I don’t want them to learn that lesson.”

Kaine Responds

“Senator, what do you say to that argument that Democrats projected weakness here?”

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) was one of the 5 Democrats who broke ranks and ended the shutdown.

“So twofold, I have 320,000 federal employees in Virginia and together with their families, that’s probably 700,000 dependents. Getting them all back to work with two paychecks that they’ve missed restored with protections against future firings.”

Kaine’s concrete representation:

  • 320,000 federal employees in Virginia
  • ~700,000 dependents (families)
  • All need to go back to work
  • Need missed pay restored
  • Need future protection from retaliation

“You know, some folks like AOC may think that’s nothing. Virginians think it’s an awful lot.”

Kaine’s direct criticism of AOC. She considers 320,000 federal workers + 700,000 dependents “nothing.” Virginians disagree.

”Another Week”

“And second, if the goal was to try to get healthcare front and center, she was not at the table with the Republicans in the Senate. And so maybe she thinks that the Republicans would have caved.”

Kaine’s argument: AOC wasn’t actually negotiating. He was. AOC has theoretical opinions; Kaine had practical experience with Republican unwillingness to cave.

“Would it have been another week of SNAP recipients losing their SNAP benefits? Another month of air traffic or air travelers enduring chaos and even danger? Another two months of federal employees losing their paychecks?”

The concrete alternatives:

  • Another week: SNAP disruption
  • Another month: air travel chaos and danger
  • Another two months: federal workers without pay

“I was at the table with the Republican senators and I knew if we wanted to get to the healthcare discussion, we had to open up government.”

Kaine’s operational insight: to get healthcare negotiation, first open the government. Cannot negotiate healthcare while government is shut. The sequencing mattered.

Ramirez on Schumer

Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL) delivered the brutal assessment. “The reality is Chuck Schumer failed us.”

The blunt framework. Schumer failed the party.

“He, yes, he voted with us, but there’s no way that eight senators, some of the most closest senators to him, voted, negotiated privately or on the side and did what they did without him knowing.”

Ramirez’s framework: Schumer can’t claim he didn’t know. 8 senators (some very close to Schumer) negotiated private deals with Republicans. Schumer either knew and allowed it, or failed to prevent it despite his position.

Either option reflects failed leadership.

“The reality is that the Senate needs new leadership.”

Ramirez directly calling for Schumer to be replaced. House Rep calling for Senate leadership change is unusual — typically each chamber manages its own leadership.

”Someone That’s Actually Going to Speak Up”

“I’m not in the Senate, so I don’t want to impose my own ideas of who I think should be there. But I know the kind of person they need. Someone that’s actually going to speak up, say the unpopular things when necessary, bring people together and demonstrate they’re fighting like hell collectively and holding the line.”

Ramirez’s framework for ideal Democratic Senate leader:

  • Speaks up
  • Says unpopular things
  • Brings people together
  • Fights collectively
  • Holds the line

The implied criticism of Schumer: he doesn’t speak up, avoids unpopular things, doesn’t hold coalition together, doesn’t fight collectively, loses the line.

“And that means every single senator, including the two that were consistently voting with Republicans up until the final vote.”

Ramirez also wants internal party discipline. Senators who voted with Republicans throughout the shutdown should be brought in line. The demand: party unity enforced by strong leadership.

Significance

The day captured Democratic disintegration:

  1. Kennedy’s color commentary: Working-class Republican voters eat up Kennedy’s style. His characterizations (moonbat, tofu, Bolshevik) are memeable and shareable. Democrats struggle to respond because the descriptions fit.

  2. AOC vs Kaine: Progressive wing attacks moderates for ending shutdown. Moderates push back with concrete constituent impact. AOC’s “Democrats are weak” framework alienates moderates she needs.

  3. Ramirez attacks Schumer: Even progressive House members calling for Schumer replacement. “Failed us” is devastating language from within the party.

  4. Dead-ends visible: Democratic path forward unclear. Progressives want more shutdowns. Moderates want resolution. Leadership crisis. No consensus.

Kennedy’s Kennedy-isms work because:

  • Authentic Louisiana Southern character
  • Intelligent analysis wrapped in folksy delivery
  • Specific vivid characterizations
  • Memorable soundbites
  • Political targets who can’t respond in kind

AOC’s framework of “hurt workers more to force holdout” reveals progressive willingness to maximize suffering. This is politically suicidal in many districts. Kaine’s 320,000 Virginia federal workers + 700,000 families illustrates the practical impact.

Ramirez’s Schumer attack is generationally significant. Young progressive House members openly demanding senior Senate leadership removal reflects generational transition pressure. Schumer’s position is increasingly untenable.

Key Takeaways

  • Kennedy on socialism: “Those who have read history clearly understand that socialism is for morons … The moon wing, the Bolshevik wing, the socialist wing of the Democratic Party is obviously in control. That’s what drove the shutdown.”
  • Kennedy on Seattle: “She’s a typical moonbat. A community organizer probably eats tofu and organic broccoli. She’s a self-avowed socialist … I’ll stop being mean if she’ll stop being foolish.”
  • Kennedy on Schumer: “Remember the old Jack Nicholson movie line, a go-sell crazy somewhere else, we’re all stocked up here. I don’t think Chuck saw the movie. Chuck kept saying we got this, but none of them had it and they all needed therapy.”
  • AOC and Kaine: AOC: “The lesson that they’re learning is that Democrats are weak and that next time we just need to hurt working people and working Americans more to get them to hold.” Kaine: “You know, some folks like AOC may think that’s nothing. Virginians think it’s an awful lot … Would it have been another week of SNAP recipients losing their SNAP benefits? Another month of air traffic or air travelers enduring chaos and even danger?”
  • Ramirez on Schumer: “Chuck Schumer failed us … there’s no way that eight senators, some of the most closest senators to him, voted, negotiated privately or on the side and did what they did without him knowing. The reality is that the Senate needs new leadership.”

Watch on YouTube →