Cruz: Previously Considered You For Board Of Amtrak, A Position You Were Qualified For
Cruz: Previously Considered You For Board Of Amtrak, A Position You Were Qualified For
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) delivered a devastating comparison during FAA Administrator nominee Phil Washington’s Senate Commerce Committee hearing, noting that the Biden administration had previously considered Washington for the Amtrak board — “a position you were qualified for” that “might well have received bipartisan support” — while now asking the Senate to confirm him for the FAA despite his lack of aviation expertise. Cruz then asked a technical question about conflicting angle-of-attack sensor readings that contributed to the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines crashes, which Washington could not answer, citing his non-pilot status.
The Amtrak Contrast
- Previous consideration: Administration had considered Washington for Amtrak board.
- Transit alignment: Amtrak role would align with Washington’s transit experience.
- Bipartisan potential: Cruz acknowledged it “might have received bipartisan support.”
- Qualification match: Amtrak role better matched Washington’s background.
- Clear contrast: Clear contrast with mismatched FAA role.
The Buses and Trains Framing
- Transit experience: Washington had extensive bus and train experience.
- Metro Denver: RTD Denver leadership in transit.
- Los Angeles Metro: LA Metro transit leadership.
- Rail vs. aviation: Fundamental difference between rail and aviation.
- Surface vs. air: Surface transportation distinct from aviation.
The Technical Question
- Angle of attack sensors: Critical aircraft safety sensors.
- Conflicting readings: Technical scenario involving conflicting sensor data.
- Pilot response: Proper pilot response to conflicting readings.
- Safety critical: Safety critical decision-making.
- Expertise required: Deep aviation expertise required to answer.
The Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines Crashes
- MCAS system: Boeing 737 MAX MCAS system involved in both crashes.
- 2018 Lion Air: Lion Air Flight 610 crashed in October 2018, killing 189.
- 2019 Ethiopian: Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed in March 2019, killing 157.
- Sensor failures: Angle of attack sensor failures played key roles.
- Systemic failures: Crashes revealed systemic safety failures.
Washington’s Honest Answer
- Non-pilot admission: Washington admitted he was not a pilot.
- Cannot answer: Said he couldn’t answer the technical question.
- Human reaction frame: Initially suggested “human reaction needs to take over.”
- Intellectual honesty: Demonstrated intellectual honesty.
- Political damage: Political damage from clear expertise gap.
The Pattern of Questioning
- Technical depth: Cruz demonstrated technical depth.
- Cumulative impact: Cumulative impact devastated nomination.
- Substantive critique: Substantive critique of qualifications.
- Policy purpose: Genuine policy purpose beyond politics.
- Aviation safety focus: Focus on aviation safety implications.
The MCAS System Context
- Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System: Flight control system.
- Safety critical: Safety critical system for 737 MAX.
- Failure modes: Multiple potential failure modes.
- Pilot training: Pilot training implications.
- Regulatory failures: FAA regulatory failures contributed.
Boeing Accountability
- Regulatory capture: Concerns about regulatory capture.
- Certification process: 737 MAX certification process scrutinized.
- Corporate culture: Corporate culture concerns.
- Legal settlements: Settlements with victim families.
- Ongoing oversight: Continuing oversight challenges.
The Administration’s Defense Difficulty
- Expertise gap: Clear expertise gap impossible to deny.
- Political defense: Limited political defense options.
- Military service: Military service emphasized as asset.
- Diversity frame: Diversity framing of candidate.
- Insufficient arguments: Arguments insufficient against technical critique.
The FAA Modernization Challenge
- Certification reform: Aircraft certification reform needs.
- Workforce development: Aviation workforce development.
- Technology evolution: Rapid technology evolution.
- International coordination: International regulatory coordination.
- Safety culture: Safety culture throughout industry.
The Confirmation Politics
- Senator performance: Senators’ performances in hearings.
- Media coverage: Sustained media coverage.
- Public record: Public record established.
- Professional communities: Professional community responses.
- Political consequences: Political consequences for administration.
Alternative Confirmation Paths
- Technical credentials: Technical credentials could have helped.
- Industry experience: Industry experience could have helped.
- Aviation specificity: Aviation-specific experience important.
- Mixed backgrounds: Some successful FAA leaders had mixed backgrounds.
- Political capital: Political capital needed for non-traditional nominees.
Key Takeaways
- Sen. Ted Cruz noted Washington had previously been considered for the Amtrak board — a position matching his transit experience.
- Cruz acknowledged the Amtrak role “might well have received bipartisan support” given Washington’s qualifications.
- Cruz’s technical question about angle-of-attack sensors revealed Washington’s inability to answer aviation-specific questions.
- The Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines crashes referenced by Cruz involved MCAS sensor failures.
- Washington honestly admitted he was not a pilot and couldn’t answer technical flight questions.
- The hearing exposed fundamental mismatch between nominee’s background and FAA Administrator role requirements.
Transcript Highlights
The following quotations are drawn from an AI-generated Whisper transcript of the hearing and should be considered unverified pending official transcript release.
- “My understanding is this administration previously considered you for the board of Amtrak. That could well have been a position you were qualified for, and you might well have received bipartisan support to serve in that role.” — Sen. Cruz
- “Buses and trains are very different from planes.” — Sen. Cruz
- “What happens when you get a different reading from two different angle of attack sensors?” — Sen. Cruz
- “Well, Senator, I’m not a pilot. I don’t know if I can answer that particular question.” — Phil Washington
- “Those are all people who know something about aviation and safety.” — Sen. Cruz
- “I see a record where you’ve got experience with buses, you’ve got experience with trains.” — Sen. Cruz
Full transcript: 152 words transcribed via Whisper AI.