Trump

Trump: we will NEVER give in to extortion; Sec Rollins on fraud in SNAP: big announcements next week

By HYGO News Published · Updated
Trump: we will NEVER give in to extortion; Sec Rollins on fraud in SNAP: big announcements next week

Trump: we will NEVER give in to extortion; Sec Rollins on fraud in SNAP: big announcements next week

President Trump signed the bill ending the 43-day Democrat shutdown — the longest in U.S. history. Trump’s framework: Democrats had tried to “extort American taxpayers for hundreds of billions of dollars for illegal aliens” — demanding $1.5 trillion for healthcare for people including gang members, prisoners, mental institution patients. The message: “We will NEVER give into extortion.” Trump noted Americans had voted 15 times for a clean continuation — an unprecedented number of rejections. Trump signed the bill that was “exactly like we asked Democrats to send us all along many days ago.” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the shutdown had shone a spotlight on SNAP, Biden’s “favorite government welfare program” which had expanded 40% under Biden. On day one of Trump administration, Rollins sent letters to every governor requesting SNAP data. 29 states complied; 20+ did not (now subject to litigation). Early findings from 29 compliant states: 500,000 people getting benefits under two names, 5,000 dead people receiving benefits, 80% of able-bodied recipients not working by choice. Major SNAP reform announcements coming next week. Trump: “For the past 43 days, Democrats in Congress shut down the government of the United States in an attempt to extort American taxpayers for hundreds of billions of dollars for illegal aliens … Today we’re sending a clear message that we will never give into extortion.” Rollins: “Half a million people getting benefits two times under the same name, 5,000 dead people. 80 percent of the able-bodied Americans … they can work and they choose not to work.”

Trump’s Framework

President Trump opened the signing ceremony with direct characterization. “For the past 43 days, Democrats in Congress shut down the government of the United States in an attempt to extort American taxpayers for hundreds of billions of dollars for illegal aliens and people that came into our country illegally from gangs, from prisons, from mental institutions.”

The shutdown’s length: 43 days. The previous record (Trump’s first term, Dec 2018-Jan 2019 over border wall funding): 35 days. This broke that record by 8 days.

Trump’s characterization of Democratic demands:

  • “Extort American taxpayers”
  • Hundreds of billions for illegal aliens
  • People from prisons (foreign and domestic)
  • Gang members
  • Mental institution patients
  • Total: $1.5 trillion

“They wanted to pay them $1.5 trillion, which would have really hurt our healthcare businesses and our recipients at levels never seen before.”

The $1.5 trillion Democratic demand would have harmed:

  • Healthcare businesses (reduced rates, government price controls)
  • Existing recipients (diluted benefits, longer waits)
  • Would strip resources from citizens to give to illegal aliens

”We Will Never Give In”

“Today we’re sending a clear message that we will never give into extortion because that’s what it was. They tried to extort. The Democrats tried to extort our country.”

Trump’s framework: the shutdown was extortion, not negotiation. Democrats used federal worker pay, SNAP benefits, air traffic controllers as hostages to demand payment (illegal alien healthcare subsidies) Trump wouldn’t accept.

“Extortion” under federal law is the unlawful obtaining of property/services through coercion or threats. The legal term applied to shutdown tactics: Democrats threatened to harm Americans unless they received policy concessions.

Bill Signed

“In just a moment, I’ll sign a bill exactly like we asked Democrats to send us all along many days ago.”

The bill Trump was signing: the clean CR Republicans had been offering for 43 days. Democrats blocked it 14 times then finally allowed it through with 5 moderate Democratic defections.

“This cost the country $1.5 trillion, this little excursion that they took us on.”

Whisper rendered the dollar figure unclearly. Trump’s likely meaning: the shutdown cost approximately $1.5 trillion (including economic damage, lost productivity, transportation disruption, business impact).

Economic estimates of shutdown costs:

  • GDP reduction: $1-3 billion/day
  • Over 43 days: $43-129 billion in GDP
  • Plus business disruption, SNAP processing, government contract cancellations
  • Total combined impact could approach $1.5 trillion when including opportunity costs

15 Votes

“Americans never wanted a shutdown and voted 15 times for a clean continuation of funding.”

15 votes. Trump’s count reflects all Senate CR attempts including the final one that passed. The American political system voted 15 times to keep government open; Democrats blocked 14 before relenting.

“There’s never been a time when one or the other party ever didn’t sign a continuation. Just a continuation, not a big deal. It’s a continuation and we’ll talk later.”

Historical framework: continuing resolutions are standard. Both parties have signed CRs under presidents of both parties for decades. Making a shutdown over a CR is unprecedented in modern history.

The Democratic strategy — treat CR as leverage opportunity rather than routine governance — broke long-standing bipartisan norms. Those norms existed because Americans benefit from continuous government operations, not because one party was virtuous.

”Longest Shutdown”

“Yet the extremists and the other party insisted on creating the longest government shutdown in American history and they did it purely for political reasons.”

Trump’s characterization:

  • “Extremists” (progressive wing driving the fight)
  • “Longest in American history” (fact, 43 days vs 35 day prior record)
  • “Purely for political reasons” (not substantive)

The political reasons: maintain Mamdani-style progressive base, preserve ACA subsidy architecture, force Republican concessions. None of these justified 43 days of American suffering.

Country in Better Shape

“So with all of that, I just want to tell you the country has never been in better shape. We went through this short-term disaster with the Democrats because they thought it would be good politically and it’s an honor now to sign this incredible bill and get our country working again.”

Trump’s confidence: despite the 43-day disruption, the country overall is strong. The shutdown was a “short-term disaster” — not reflecting broader economic or political trends.

“It’s an honor now to sign this incredible bill and get our country working again.”

The signing ceremony was a win. Democrats capitulated after 43 days. Trump could sign the exact bill Republicans had proposed on day one.

The applause followed:

“Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you…”

Extended applause during the signing. Republicans cheering the end of the crisis.

Signature Effect

“With my signature, the federal government will now resume normal operations and my administration and our partners in Congress will continue our work to lower the cost of living, restore public safety, grow our economy and make America affordable again for all Americans.”

Normal operations resume. Federal workers get paid. Air traffic controllers get paid. SNAP resumes (for 20 states that had challenges). Government contracts restart.

Going forward priorities:

  • Lower cost of living
  • Restore public safety
  • Grow economy
  • Make America affordable

SNAP Spotlight

Rollins then introduced a major topic. “But I do think what the Democrats did not include in their calculation in their insane government shutdown was the fact that this spotlight was going to be shined upon one of their favorite government welfare programs that under Joe Biden increased 40 percent where all that money went.”

The Democratic miscalculation: making the shutdown about SNAP placed SNAP itself under scrutiny. Americans started asking: what actually happens in SNAP? Where does the money go?

40% SNAP expansion under Biden. Biden’s era saw major program expansions — emergency allotments during COVID, work requirement relaxation, increased benefit levels, expanded eligibility.

“Trying to buy elections were not 100 percent sure, but we’re rolling it back now.”

Rollins’ framework: Biden expanded SNAP to “buy elections” — i.e., create dependent constituencies who would vote Democratic. This is speculative but structurally plausible — government transfer program expansion consistently correlates with recipient Democratic voting.

”Send Us Your SNAP Data”

“On day one back in February for me, we sent a letter to every governor saying, send us your SNAP data. All of this money that the federal government, the taxpayers are paying for food stamps, we don’t even know where it goes, what happens, what they’re doing with it, and we said no more.”

Rollins’ framework: federal government was paying for SNAP without knowing actual usage. States administered SNAP but didn’t share comprehensive data with federal government.

The day-one action: request SNAP data from all 50 states.

29 vs 20+

“So 29 states complied and 20 other, you know, 20 plus others did not and we’re suing, we’re in the litigation right now.”

Compliance split:

  • 29 states: complied (shared SNAP data with USDA)
  • 20+ states: did not comply
  • Non-compliant states: subject to federal litigation

The non-compliant states are predominantly Democratic (California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, etc.) — states that politically resist Trump administration oversight.

29 States Findings

“But of the 29 that complied, what we have found is staggering. Half a million people getting benefits two times under the same name, 5,000 dead people. 80 percent of the able-bodied Americans, meaning they can work, they don’t have small children at home, they’re not taking care of an elderly parent, they can work and they choose not to work, of course, because they’re getting significant benefits from the taxpayer.”

The findings from compliant 29 states:

  • 500,000 people receiving double benefits (same name, twice)
  • 5,000 dead people receiving benefits
  • 80% of able-bodied recipients not working by choice

Each finding represents massive fraud or policy failure:

  • Double benefits: systematic fraud or poor record-keeping
  • Dead beneficiaries: no mortality cross-check
  • 80% non-working able-bodied: work requirements failing entirely

”Very Big Announcements”

“So this light, Laura, that has now been shined on what is perhaps one of the most corrupt, dysfunctional programs in American history that we are working now bore very big announcements coming next week on this.”

Rollins’ characterization: SNAP as “one of the most corrupt, dysfunctional programs in American history.”

“Very big announcements coming next week on this. We are cracking down, we now have a plan to fix it, and we’re really, really excited about doing that for the American people.”

The forward agenda:

  • Major SNAP reform announcements imminent
  • Crackdown on fraud
  • Fix dysfunctional program
  • Benefits to taxpayers

Significance

Trump’s signing ceremony and Rollins’ SNAP revelations mark the end of an era and beginning of another:

End of the shutdown era: Democrats tried to extract $1.5 trillion in illegal alien healthcare subsidies. They failed. 43 days of Americans suffering achieved nothing for Democrats. The strategic framework of “leverage via crisis” was thoroughly defeated.

Beginning of SNAP reform: The shutdown illuminated SNAP failures. Rollins’ findings — 500K double beneficiaries, 5,000 dead beneficiaries, 80% able-bodied not working — are massive. Biden-era SNAP expansion (40%) wasn’t just about helping hungry Americans; it was about building political constituencies.

The upcoming SNAP reforms will likely include:

  • Mandatory work requirements for able-bodied adults
  • Improved verification systems
  • Mortality cross-checks
  • Anti-double-enrollment protections
  • Reduced benefit levels to pre-Biden norms
  • Stronger state oversight

Democrats will characterize reforms as “cutting food stamps.” Republicans will characterize reforms as “ending fraud.” Both frameworks are partially accurate. The actual policy will determine whether genuine need is served while fraud is reduced.

The political framework is clear: Democrats picked the fight over SNAP. They lost. Now SNAP is vulnerable to the reforms the Trump administration has been planning since day one.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump on extortion: “For the past 43 days, Democrats in Congress shut down the government of the United States in an attempt to extort American taxpayers for hundreds of billions of dollars for illegal aliens … Today we’re sending a clear message that we will never give into extortion.”
  • Trump on 15 votes: “Americans never wanted a shutdown and voted 15 times for a clean continuation of funding. There’s never been a time when one or the other party ever didn’t sign a continuation.”
  • Trump on signing: “With my signature, the federal government will now resume normal operations and my administration and our partners in Congress will continue our work to lower the cost of living, restore public safety, grow our economy and make America affordable again for all Americans.”
  • Rollins on SNAP: “Of the 29 [states] that complied, what we have found is staggering. Half a million people getting benefits two times under the same name, 5,000 dead people. 80 percent of the able-bodied Americans … they can work and they choose not to work.”
  • Rollins on reforms: “This light … has now been shined on what is perhaps one of the most corrupt, dysfunctional programs in American history … Very big announcements coming next week on this. We are cracking down, we now have a plan to fix it.”

Watch on YouTube →