Kirby On Chinese Hacks: "Unfortunately, Sometimes They Get Through" — "Not For Lack Of Trying"
Kirby On Chinese Hacks: “Unfortunately, Sometimes They Get Through” — “Not For Lack Of Trying”
A reporter pressed NSC Coordinator John Kirby during a July 2023 White House briefing on whether the Biden administration was doing enough proactively to prevent Chinese and foreign government cyberattacks on U.S. government emails. The reporter framed: “You just said that you fend off these attacks every day, but in this case you didn’t fend it off and all the things you talked about were reactive, not proactive.” Kirby acknowledged: “We work at it every single day. Does that mean that you can prevent every single attack of every single nature? No. Unfortunately, sometimes they get through, but it’s not for lack of trying. This isn’t the kind of thing that you fix and walk away from.”
The Fend Off Attacks Every Day
- Reporter framing: “You just said that you fend off these attacks every day.”
- Editorial reach: The framing positioned Kirby’s prior framing.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to coverage.
The Didn’t Fend Off
- Reporter framing: “But in this case you didn’t fend it off.”
- Editorial reach: The framing dramatized core gap.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to coverage.
The Reactive Not Proactive
- Reporter framing: “And all the things you talked about were reactive, not proactive.”
- Editorial reach: The framing dramatized response posture.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to coverage.
The Doing Enough Proactively
- Reporter framing: “So are you doing enough to proactively prevent the Chinese or another government from gaining access into our government emails?”
- Editorial reach: The framing pressed for substantive answer.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to coverage.
The Work At It Every Day
- Kirby framing: “We work at it every single day.”
- Editorial reach: The framing positioned ongoing effort.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
The Prevent Every Single Attack
- Kirby framing: “Does that mean that you can prevent every single attack of every single nature? No.”
- Editorial reach: The framing dramatized realistic limitation.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
The Sometimes They Get Through
- Kirby framing: “Unfortunately, sometimes they get through.”
- Editorial reach: The framing dramatized core acknowledgment.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
The Not For Lack Of Trying
- Kirby framing: “But it’s not for lack of trying.”
- Editorial reach: The framing positioned effort defense.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
The Fix And Walk Away
- Kirby framing: “This isn’t the kind of thing that you fix and walk away from.”
- Editorial reach: The framing positioned ongoing nature.
- Hearing record: The framing is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging.
- Long arc: The framing fed broader debates.
The Chinese Hack Layer
- Editorial reach: Chinese hack of U.S. government emails was central to July 2023 coverage.
- Hearing record: The Chinese hack context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The Chinese hack continued through 2024.
- Long arc: The Chinese hack shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: The Chinese hack fed broader debates.
The Government Emails Layer
- Editorial reach: Government emails were central to cybersecurity coverage.
- Hearing record: The government emails context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: Government emails continued through 2024.
- Long arc: Government emails shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: Government emails fed broader debates.
The Cybersecurity Layer
- Editorial reach: Cybersecurity was central to administration policy.
- Hearing record: The cybersecurity context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: Cybersecurity continued through 2024.
- Long arc: Cybersecurity shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: Cybersecurity fed broader debates.
The Microsoft Hack Layer
- Editorial reach: Microsoft Storm-0558 hack accessed State Department and Commerce emails.
- Hearing record: The Microsoft hack context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: Microsoft hack continued to be referenced.
- Long arc: Microsoft hack shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: Microsoft hack fed broader debates.
The U.S. China Diplomacy
- Editorial reach: U.S.-China diplomacy was central to 2023.
- Hearing record: The diplomacy context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: Diplomacy continued through 2024.
- Long arc: Diplomacy shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: Diplomacy fed broader debates.
The Republican Critique
- Editorial reach: Republicans cite Biden cybersecurity as inadequate.
- Hearing record: The Republican critique context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The critique continued through 2024.
- Long arc: The critique shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: The critique fed broader debates.
The Democratic Defense
- Editorial reach: Democrats defend Biden cybersecurity efforts.
- Hearing record: The Democratic defense context is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The defense continued through 2024.
- Long arc: The defense shaped subsequent debates.
- Long arc: The defense fed broader debates.
The Kirby Public Posture
- NSC Coordinator: Kirby held NSC role.
- Editorial reach: Kirby’s posture shaped administration messaging.
- Hearing record: Kirby’s posture is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: Kirby continued to be central through 2024.
- Long arc: Kirby shaped subsequent debates.
The Briefing Discipline
- Kirby discipline: Kirby maintained message discipline.
- Editorial reach: The discipline reflected coordinated administration messaging.
- Hearing record: The discipline is now in the formal record.
- Long arc: The discipline shaped subsequent administration messaging.
- Long arc: The discipline became a model for crisis briefings.
The Public Communication Layer
- Soundbite design: The exchange was structured for clip distribution.
- Documentary value: The hearing record now contains a clean Kirby framing.
- Media uptake: The clip moved on conservative media as a Republican response argument.
- Audience targeting: Kirby’s style is built for retail political distribution.
- Long arc: The framing remained central to administration messaging through 2024.
The 2024 Implications
- Election positioning: Both parties used cybersecurity for 2024 positioning.
- China salience: China became central in 2024 coverage.
- Long arc: The episode will shape cybersecurity debates through 2024 and beyond.
- Hearing legacy: The hearing record will be cited in future cybersecurity debates.
- Long arc: The framing remains in circulation.
Key Takeaways
- A reporter pressed Kirby on Chinese cyber attack response.
- Reporter dramatized “reactive, not proactive” criticism.
- Kirby acknowledged “sometimes they get through.”
- Kirby positioned defense as “not for lack of trying.”
- Kirby framed cybersecurity as ongoing work.
- The exchange dramatized cybersecurity defense.
Transcript Highlights
The following quotations are drawn from an AI-generated Whisper transcript of the briefing and should be considered unverified pending official transcript release.
- “You just said that you fend off these attacks every day, but in this case you didn’t fend it off and all the things you talked about were reactive, not proactive” — reporter
- “So are you doing enough to proactively prevent the Chinese or another government from gaining access into our government emails?” — reporter
- “We work at it every single day” — Kirby
- “Does that mean that you can prevent every single attack of every single nature? No” — Kirby
- “Unfortunately, sometimes they get through, but it’s not for lack of trying” — Kirby
- “This isn’t the kind of thing that you fix and walk away from” — Kirby
Full transcript: 98 words transcribed via Whisper AI.