Spox Can’t Name Single One Reduce Border Patrol; Iranian $6B & $10B Fungibility Just Not Stand Up

NSC John Kirby Can’t Name One Single Lawmaker Who Has Called To Reduce Border Patrol Agents

“Can the administration name a single lawmaker who has called to reduce the number of Border Patrol agents?”

KIRBY: Well, no…

NSC John Kirby On The Unlocked Iranian Funds “The Fungibility Argument Just Doesn’t Stand Up”

Top Biden spokesman John Kirby on the tens of billions of dollars the United States has released for Iran: “The fungibility argument just doesn’t stand up!”

why humanitarian purpose not to be transparent?

Iran Made Transactions From Their Biden Fund, And John Kirby Is Lost: “I Don’t Have Details On That”

“Iran made two transactions withdrawing from the previously frozen funds in Oman. What were those transactions for?”

JOHN KIRBY: “I don’t have details on that”

https://www.facebook.com/HygoNewsUSA/videos/267980266031650

Spox Can’t Name Single One to Reduce Border Patrol; Iranian $6B & $10B Fungibility Just Doesn’t Stand Up

Key Points

NSC John Kirby Can’t Name One Single Lawmaker Who Has Called To Reduce Border Patrol Agents

“Can the administration name a single lawmaker who has called to reduce the number of Border Patrol agents

• NSC John Kirby On The Unlocked Iranian Funds “The Fungibility Argument Just Doesn’t Stand Up”

Top Biden spokesman John Kirby on the tens of billions of dollars the United States has released for Iran: “The fungibility argument just doesn’t stand up”

why humanitarian purpose not to be transparent

• Iran Made Transactions From Their Biden Fund, And John Kirby Is Lost: “I Don’t Have Details On That”

“Iran made two transactions withdrawing from the previously frozen funds in Oman

Transcript Highlights

Transcribed from the video audio:

• Question, can the administration name a single lawmaker who has called to reduce the number of Border Patrol agents
• Well, I would argue, I think Karina has talked about this
• I mean, the fact that they voted down proposed legislation that would, at the president’s urging, increase the number
• So, just by dint of the sheer numbers in the votes, the House Republicans have said they don’t favor increasing the number of Border agents
• And you heard Speaker Johnson down at the border yesterday that they’re not interested in moving forward on the president’s national security supplemental, which had $6 billion in there, much of it designed to get us another 1,300 Border agents
• Why about the 2,000 Border Patrol agents being eliminated
• I think that’s a reference to the House DHS Appropriations Bill, which was obviously not taken up by the Senate
• But that very bill, I mean, Republicans say that it actually would have increased the number of Border Patrol agents because it was going to eliminate funds for climate change and clean energy programs
• I mean, the White House even issued a statement at that time saying that those cuts to those programs would be palatable to the president
• But this is sort of the first time I’ve been hearing this claim about eliminating 2,000 Border Patrol agents and painting a picture like we’re short 2,000 at the border when, in fact, that didn’t happen