On 7/11/2022, Jill Biden delivered a speech at a “Latinx IncluXion Luncheon” in San Antonio. She claimed during that Hispanics are as unique as “tacos” and “bogidas,” the latter term appearing to be a butchering of “bodega.” Biden received widespread criticism for the “bogidas” comment, as well as the claim that Hispanics are as unique as breakfast tacos. The very idea of the term “Latinx” is rejected by many Latinos. The luncheon is part of the 2022 UnidosUS Annual Conference, provides “the opportunity to learn about and collaborate on issues ranging from housing to health, racial equity to education, diversity and inclusion to owning our narrative as a community. A new poll has found that white liberals are nine times more likely to use the term “Latinx” than actual Hispanics are. Jill Biden referred to bodegas in Bronx as “bogidas” while Hispandering to the Latinx community and La Raza. “But we can’t get these things on our own,” Dr. Jill explained. “Raul helped build this organization with the understanding that the diversity of this community, as distinct as the bogidas [sic] of the Bronx, as beautiful as the blossoms of Miami, and as unique as the breakfast tacos here in San Antonio.” Dr. Jill said.
On 7/11/2022, President Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan essentially admitted that President Joe Biden will beg Saudi Arabia for more oil during his upcoming visit, during the White House press briefing.
Jake Sullivan also said we’re “clear-eyed,” which is the same phrase used to describe the Afghanistan withdrawal. On 8/17/2021, reporter asked, I think the question out there on Capitol Hill and around Washington and elsewhere is: Wasn’t there another choice? Wasn’t there a way you could have ended — President Biden could have ended the war in the way that he wanted to end the war so that Americans don’t sacrifice further lives for this war, but, at the same time, do a better job of either ignoring Ghani’s, you know, request to — to not start evacuations or, you know, figuring some way that we wouldn’t end up in a situation where there’s masses of people crushing through the airport and the execution of the last four, five, six days that has seemed, to just about everybody, as not — I mean, as not the way a competent administration — you know, not the result that a competent administration, you know, has in the end? So, was it — isn’t that a false choice? And why couldn’t you do both?
MR. SULLIVAN: So, first, what I would say is that we were clear-eyed going in when we made this decision that it was possible that the Taliban would end up in control of Afghanistan. We were clear-eyed about that. Now, as the President said in his remarks yesterday, we did not anticipate that it would happen at this speed, though we were planning for these potential contingencies. The reason I say that at the outset — that we knew it was possible they could take over and that had to be built into our calculus in making the determination, as the President did, to draw down our forces — is because once the Taliban came into Kabul, we were going to be faced with a situation — no matter if there were still U.S. troops on the ground or no U.S. troops on the ground — of dealing with a significant number of people wanting to come to an airport to try to get evacuated.
https://facebook.com/HygoNewsUSA/videos/527436162503845/
Jill Biden “bogidas” vs “bodega” Latinx. Clear-eyed Sullivan admitted Biden beg Saudi Arabia oil.